Again, this depends on the user whether they are taking user-friendliness into account or not when choosing between BlueStacks and Nox. So, in this case, we can say that Nox App Player, due to its simplistic user interface, is much lighter and simpler to use as compared to BlueStacks. BlueStacks occupies more space and requires 2 GB minimum RAM as compared to the minimum of 1 GB RAM required by Nox. Since BlueStacks is equipped with more features as compared to Nox, it’s user interface is much more complex. In this case the latest version viz BlueStacks 4 scored significantly more points as compared to the latest version of Nox App Player. The globally accepted way to compare the performance of two software is to check the benchmark results which take into consideration FPS, app compatibility, CPU/ RAM usage, and more to compute a score for the software. However, BlueStacks does outperform Nox in certain features like the latter has features like changing device profiles, automatic cursor lock-in shooting games, and more. As far as the features go, both Android emulators are equipped with key features like multiple 381607 instances, mapping, in-app record, and more.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |